In this particular instance,
the Court determined that the guest and the Association had equal knowledge
about the hazard, and therefore the Association could not be held liable.
Other communities have faced similar litigation. The majority of this litigation was also
resolved by determining who had superior knowledge about a safety condition -
such as trip hazards or criminal activity. The lesson for all
communities is that communication is key.
If a potential situation cannot be remedied immediately, it is critical
that all residents be put on notice. In
addition, other steps can be taken such as possibly installing signage or
temporarily closing dangerous areas, so that everyone has an equal level of
knowledge. The Board cannot afford to
bury its head in the sand when such a situation comes to light. Permitting the problem to fester is
negligence.
While Community Association
Managers assist in identifying such dangers, the Board should not rely solely
on the manager, who may not be around when a hazard arises (such as lighting outages
or sinkhole formations over the weekend).
Depending on the terms of the management contract, some managers may
only visit/inspect the property once a week or once a month. Every tragedy is not avoidable, but it is
crucial for Boards and residents to partner in policing the common areas for
such hazards or potential hazards.
In a perfect world,
communities that have taken all appropriate measures would never find
themselves in court. In a perfect world
no one would be injured.
There are several additional
actions that a cautious Board may decide to take in order to be best protected,
should a situation like this arise. A Board might consider ordering an audit or
review of the community’s insurance coverage, as there may be exclusions or
inadequate coverages that have not been detected. Better to discover these in advance! A Board might also institute a regular maintenance
review of the community. A maintenance review, coupled with a capital reserve
review by an engineer every few years, can also be an effective way to further
insulate the community by relying on the opinions of third-party experts. Finally, an annual conference with the
Association’s attorney to review all contracts, governing documents, and
standard practices is a must. The legal
expense incurred for this procedure is minor compared to avoided potential
losses.
While not a comfort
to the loved ones of the person killed in this alligator tragedy, in the eyes
of the law the community did take sufficient actions to avoid being considered
negligent. May the lessons learned
during the litigation process of the Landings Association not be lost on the
rest of our Georgia communities.






