Requiring new developments to assume maintenance
responsibility for detention & retention ponds has become standard practice
for local municipalities. These governing agencies benefit from shifting the
financial burden from themselves to Homeowner Associations. This is perhaps an easier pill to swallow for a new community, who can take over the management and maintenance of all aspects of the community from fairly early on in the process. But what happens when a county
attempts to shift responsibility for pre-existing systems in older communities?
Earlier this year, a trial court in Georgia upheld an
ordinance requiring a Homeowner Association to maintain an individual
homeowner’s storm drain system, even though the drainage system had not been
turned over to the Association, and the county ordinance was enacted years
after the placement of the system. In John Rymer v Polo Golf &
County Club Home Owners Association, Inc., the court rejected the Association's claim of
“grandfathering” and concluded that public
safety concerns outweighed contractual obligations imposed by the community's Declaration. The court stated that imposing the duty on the Homeowner Association
to maintain the drainage system “…enhances the HOA’s ability to enforce
its contractual rights under the declaration because if the individual lot
owner refuses to maintain the storm water structures on his lot then the HOA
has the backing of the ordinance which forces the HOA to ensure lot owner
compliance.”
This would be similar to any other county ordinance that a
homeowner violates, with the Association pointing to the government as “the bad
guy” when requiring compliance.
Although this decision is not considered “case law” unless
it is appealed, the reasoning behind the decision has been upheld in other
parts of the country, and Associations should plan their financials accordingly
to avoid being liable for property damage caused by flooding, sinkholes, etc.