Anecdotal evidence suggests that renters can be more destructive to
communities than their homeowner counterparts - but at least by the measure of home property values, results are
inconclusive in many research studies. What can be said with certainty is
that banks and the secondary lending market have placed caps on the percentage
of acceptable rentals in a community. Currently, FHA accepts up to 50%
rentals, whereas many banks will cap rentals at 25% or 30%. A few rentals
will not drive down home values, but communities with large numbers of rentals
do see an average 15% decline in housing prices.
With that being said, the dynamics have changed significantly since the
Great Recession. New trends show more people electing to rent over purchasing
a home, driving monthly rental rates higher and attracting a different
clientele base. In addition, some of the renters were until recently home
owners, and have a different mindset (compared to “standard” renters) when it
comes to property upkeep.
In some instances, if renters "like what they see" in the community
where they reside, they might opt to purchase a home there. Outreach by the
Association is critical at all stages of this residential cycle if the Association wants to
foster the type of environment that raises home values, regardless of occupant
status.
Community socials should be inclusive of renters, as
frequent interaction with the neighbors establishes positive peer
behavior. Some committees, such as a pet or tennis group, should permit
renters to take an active role to encourage interest in improving community
standards. Concerns voiced by renters should be treated as if coming from
the owner. As a result, renters will be less likely participate in "destructive" behavior and more likely to want to contribute to the overall well-being of the Community.
Truly an amazing page. I like what you've got in here. thanks for the share. Totally interesting indeed. thanks!
ReplyDeleteproperty management arizona