For Community Association
Managers, often the largest and most intense parts of the job are enforcing the
covenants, design standards and rules of the community. Even though every
homeowner signs a document acknowledging these regulations at the time of a
home purchase, it is a daily struggle to enforce rules with some owners.
Most homeowners are great people to work with; however, there are always those
“special” situations that are over the top.
In one Atlanta community, the
Association has a rule stating no outbuildings are permitted. A homeowner
made several modifications to a property without approval, including installing
an outbuilding. Upon learning of this, the Association asked the
homeowner to submit the modifications for approval to the Architectural Control
Committee (ACC) (some communities call it
an ARC). As you may guess, the ACC approved the modifications that
were within community standards but disapproved the outbuilding. The
homeowner attended an appeals hearing with the Board of Directors, as is often
required in most Associations, where he made an impassioned plea to keep the
unapproved outbuilding. The Board reaffirmed the ACC decision to disallow
the outbuilding as it did not meet community standards.
After some time and many
letters, the Association filed suit against the homeowner for removal of the
outbuilding and damages. So what makes this situation over the top?
It took over seven years to reach a resolution on this situation! The
outbuilding is now gone and has been replaced by a structure acceptable to both
the homeowner and the Association. The unfortunate outcome is the
incredible amount of time and money involved in reaching this resolution, along
with the needless stress everyone experienced.
Lessons? As a
homeowner, it is very important to know and follow the rules of your
Association when making any modification to your property. Simply
following the rules in this case could have avoided this entire
confrontation. As an Association, you need to be proactive in resolving
disputes. Be clear on why something is a violation and why it cannot be
allowed to continue. Try to drill down to find the heart of the dispute
and work with the owner to find a satisfactory resolution for all.
Unfortunately, a situation like this cannot always be avoided, but in most
cases it can.
A decade ago, another Atlanta
community had a dispute with a homeowner over flagpoles. The community
rules explicitly stated, “No flagpoles in the front yard”. The flagpole
in question was installed without approval. The Association required the removal of the flagpole. Even given the protection of the right to fly
the United States flag and the pitched patriotism in the midst of wars in Iraq
and Afghanistan, the Association was able to obtain removal of the flagpole.
Fast forward several years: Same community, same rules, same situation;
much different result. The Association went to court on the second flagpole
case and lost; the flagpole was allowed to stay and all accumulated fines were removed.
Lessons? Association
rules may tread on the rights of citizens. It is also true that citizens
have the ability to relinquish some of their rights as is done when someone
buys a home in an Association. That being said, rules should be carefully
reviewed with a critical eye. Any rule that could be controversial or
sensitive should be well considered.
In this situation, fighting a
veteran flying a flag is certainly not ideal and other options should be
considered: Alternative ways of flying a
flag, such as on a pole attached to the house or on a porch, or perhaps
determine a way to have flag poles as a harmonious part of an overall landscape
plan.
Proactively harmonizing regulations
to reach key goals that enhance the community should be what every Association
strives for.